Daily glaring differences between the political parties that make up the English landscape. As the Senate reform is no exception, and now opening the debate to reform the upper house, is evident once again as opposing views between them. All the spokesmen of the parties represented in the English Senate agree The camera needs an overhaul. But each seeks a different reform.
Many feel that the current Senate's role is very poor, and contributes very little, therefore, to be recovered PP consensus model of autonomy, for the Senate to represent the interests of all communities, for PSOE this establishment should be fixed in the new statutes of autonomy in deciding the powers of the various regional governments on the central government.
But although the two major parties maintain a stance "national" thinking more in the interest of the whole of Spain, nationalist and pro-independence parties, maintain a totally different position. PNV, CIU, ERC, CC, EA, etc. claim that the Senate has a purely autonomous, for communities, not provinces. Where regional governments have more power and prominence total regional constituencies, ie, betting on a territorial model and decentralized. Believe that Congress represents the interests of Spain as a whole and the Senate must do so from the total power of autonomy, to preserve a kind of federal model, something that has nothing to do with Spain autonomies.
0 comments:
Post a Comment